Every retailer and distributor has a catalog. Most treat it like a filing cabinet. A place where product information lives until someone needs it.
This is a fundamental misunderstanding.
Your catalog isn't a container. It's the operating system of your commerce business. Every search query runs against it. Every recommendation engine depends on it. Every AI tool you deploy will succeed or fail based on what it finds there.
And in most organizations, nobody truly owns it.
Most ecommerce teams blame search, SEO, or AI tools when performance stalls. In reality, those systems are only as good as the catalog data they rely on. Missing attributes, inconsistent structure, and unmanaged content quality silently undermine discovery, relevance, and automation.
Treating catalog quality as a one-time cleanup leads to regression. Treating it as a continuous system creates compounding advantages across search, AI-driven discovery, and conversion.
Want the full framework and skip the summary? Get the complete whitepaper here.
If you've been in ecommerce long enough, you've watched this pattern unfold:
Search underperforms. The CEO can't find products on the website. You call the vendor. You tune relevance settings. Results improve marginally, then plateau. You wonder if you need a better search tool.
SEO stalls. Your agency recommends more content. Richer descriptions, better keywords. You invest. Rankings fluctuate. Competitors with thinner content somehow outperform you. You wonder if the algorithm changed.
AI disappoints. You deploy a recommendation engine, a personalization platform, an enrichment tool. The demos were impressive. The results are not. You wonder if AI is overhyped.
In each case, the diagnosis focuses on the tool, the channel, or the tactic.
In each case, the actual failure is upstream. In the catalog itself.
According to Baymard Institute's 2024 benchmark study, 72% of ecommerce sites completely fail their site search expectations. Not underperform. Fail. When they tested product-finding tasks across the top 50 sites, 31% of attempts ended in failure—not because products weren't in stock, but because the search engine couldn't connect user queries to catalog data.
The search tool can't return products with missing attributes. The SEO strategy can't compensate for inconsistent category structures. The AI can't personalize against data it doesn't have.
These aren't tool failures. They're catalog failures wearing a disguise.
Catalog quality stays in the shadows for good reasons. It's not glamorous work. It doesn't have a clear owner. It doesn't fit neatly into quarterly planning.
And it's easy to work around. For a while.
A merchandiser notices a product isn't showing up in search. She manually boosts it. Problem solved—for that product, for today.
A product manager sees inconsistent attributes in a category. He builds a custom filter as a workaround. The filter works. The inconsistency remains.
A marketing team launches a campaign. Half the products have incomplete content. They manually enrich the campaign SKUs and move on. The other ten thousand products stay untouched.
These workarounds are rational. The people implementing them are good at their jobs. But each workaround is also a small act of surrender.
Over time, this creates organizational blindness. Everyone knows the catalog has problems. No one believes they can be solved at the source. So they get normalized—just part of the cost of doing business.
For years, catalog quality was a slow leak. Painful, but survivable.
That era is ending. Three forces are converging to make catalog quality a strategic priority, not just an operational nuisance.
Customers no longer find products through a single path. They search on your site, on Google, on Amazon, through voice assistants, social platforms, and increasingly through AI-powered agents.
Shopping-related searches on generative AI platforms grew 4,700% between 2024 and 2025. Traffic from ChatGPT and Perplexity to ecommerce brands spiked 752% during the 2024 holiday season. Nearly 60% of consumers now use AI to support shopping decisions.
Every channel has different requirements. Each punishes catalog inconsistency in different ways.
AI doesn't work around your data problems. It amplifies them.
MIT research shows that 82% of machine learning projects stall due to data quality issues.
An 80% complete catalog isn't 80% as effective for AI discovery. It's functionally invisible for queries requiring missing fields.
AI agents don't browse. They parse structured data and make decisions. If your catalog lacks required attributes, your product gets skipped.
Better data compounds. Better search leads to better conversion, better signal, better recommendations, and higher lifetime value.
Companies that treat catalog quality as a one-time project fall behind. Those that treat it as a system pull ahead.
This post summarizes the core argument from our whitepaper, The Problem No One Owns: Introducing the Continuous Catalog Lifecycle.
The full whitepaper goes deeper:
If you're ready to stop chasing symptoms and start building a system, get the full whitepaper below.
Download the whitepaper – The Problem No One Owns and learn how leading commerce organizations are treating catalog quality as a continuous discipline—not a periodic project.